The directors affectively used cinematography to express feeling, the passing of time, and express ideas. Often the camera focused on Libby and then on Joanne to show the communication, or lack thereof, between the two. It showed the separation between them at the beginning of their relationship until they could finally communicate. Slow motion was also used to express the passing of time as we see the progression in Libby. Both of these film rhetorical tools allowed understanding to the difficulty that Libby experiences as a deaf child and the joy that can come from gaining communication. Finally, in the finally scene the camera angle shows the playground of Libby's school from above with the array of playing children and Libby staying still. This helped depict the loneliness that Libby must feel in a silent world.
Additionally throughout the film, lighting was used to show juxtaposition between Libby's world and the communicating world. However, lighting was also used to express feeling. The lighting for the overall film is foggy and dreary until Libby begins to learn and then there is a lot of light and more outside scenes. At one point Joanne is communicating with Libby outside and smiling; there is a lot of light. The mother (Sue) is inside the house and the lighting falls to shadow her face, showing the contrast between the two worlds. The lightning allows viewers, in a symbolic way, to see that communication brought hope and joy to Libby's life when she lived in a silent, dark world.
Overall, the piece was very well done. It not only inspires and is visually beautiful, but allows the viewer to see into a contemporary issue at hand: advocacy for deaf children.
I think your analysis was very accurate -- I didn't stop to think about the visuals as being oriented to deaf children. The directors truly understood their audience on a personal level, appealing to both the hearing and deaf worlds. Very interesting point.
ReplyDelete